Features a backgrounder on the inception of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). NATO as a military alliance; NATO's troubled origins in the 1950s; Heating up of the Cold War in the 1960s; Implications of Europe's calling a political detente on NATO's political strategy; NATO's signing of the arms control accords; Improving ability to project power outside alliance borders.

This article speculates on the motives of the Soviet Union in vigorously opposing the U.S.-sponsored scheme for a North Atlantic Treaty Organization's nuclear missile fleet called multilateral force. The Soviet Union contends that the scheme is an opening wedge for the German acquisition of nuclear weapons and the scheme will irreversibly set in motion the process of nuclear proliferation.

This essay discusses diplomatic relations between the United States, the Soviet Union, and West Germany regarding the unification of Germany and the role of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in Europe.

The article focuses on North Atlantic Pact. The tasks of the council and of its defense committee are to survey the resources of the parties to the Pact, and to make recommendations for the most effective use of these resources in developing the individual and collective military power of the parties, and plans for common action to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area in case an armed attack upon one of them actually takes place.

This article explains that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is in a state of transition. The direction of its development has changed, simultaneously with a change in Europe's attitude towards all of the organizations born of the cold war.

The article focuses on North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). On June II, 1948, the Senate passed the Vandenberg Resolution which led to the participation in the formation of the NATO.

The article discusses on the accomplishments of North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). The inner councils of the alliance were deeply penetrated by Union Soviet's espionage agents which is in time of NATO's critical weakness.

NATO's objectives in relation to the conflict in Kosovo were set out in the Statement issued at the Extraordinary Meeting of the North Atlantic Council held at NATO on 12 April 1999 and were reaffirmed by Heads of State and Government in Washington on 23 April 1999.

Argues that the conflict in Bosnia and North Atlantic Treaty Organization's (NATO) inability to arrive at a strategy to address that conflict contributed both to the alliance's lack of direction in the post-cold war period.

The article calls for the establishment of a new North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). It shows that the end of the Cold War has resulted in changes in Europe's strategic landscape. It also contributes to the increasing conflict and the need for security in the region.

The tumult having subsided, it should be possible to undertake a relatively dispassionate review and analysis of NATO’s war over Kosovo. One might have expected the theme to have dominated the year-end millennarianism, considering the exuberance the war elicited in Western intellectual circles and the tidal wave of self-adulation by respected voices, lauding the first war in history fought “in the name of principles and values,” the first bold step towards a “new era” in which the “enlightened states” will protect the human rights of all under the guiding hand of an “idealistic New World bent on ending inhumanity,” now freed from the shackles of archaic concepts of world order. But it received scant mention.

The 11-week bombing campaign conducted by NATO in spring 1999 against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) has many claims to uniqueness.